View Single Post
Old 10-08-2022, 08:15 AM   #663
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownedbycats View Post
Reading a sci-fi novel and noticed the author kept referring to 'sentients' -- seeing as there were multiple alien species, I didn't think too much of it (though I'm pedantic enough to think it should been 'sapients'). But then I saw the word 'sentientarian.' Ouch.
Well, "sapient" is usually considered an adjective so not sure "sapients" is an ideal solution. The OED does offer "sapient" as a noun but "In later use only jocularly", and I didn't find anyone else. (The OED also offers the words sapiential, sapientious, and sapientipotent - which I rather like.)

Whereas "sentient" seems to be considered both a noun and adjective by various dictionaries (OED, Chambers, dictionary.com), without suggesting it is a joke, so I think I like "sentients" better.

But "sentientarian" ... sounds like an age description, so maybe a being made old with the weight of their wisdom. Am I close?
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote