Thread: Seriousness eBooks: a danger to posterity?
View Single Post
Old 04-12-2009, 01:36 PM   #13
tirsales
MIA ... but returning som
tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tirsales ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tirsales's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,600
Karma: 511342
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germany
Device: PRS-505 and *Really* not owning a PRS-700
It's even worse - the paper used nowadays is not very robust - in older days stone or parchment (or more stable paper) - which could last centuries. Even the paper used in our days will only last 10-100 years - and thats not long. Though: not only our digital data, also the analog is going down. Our houses are not build as strong as the fortresses from older days - and who is nowadays throwing corpses and treasures into swamps?
At least plastic seems to be robust

And .. well - to the BBC: It should be known that "data archiving" is not finished with backuping it once - the backups have to be checked, copied and reformatted every 1-5 years ... (It's not done with ensuring that you can read the media - who could read '88s data format? Which is why some special (open-)formats (e.g. special pdf types) are used for long-term archives).
OTOH: no worries, most governments use some kind of long-term archives (e.g. in old salt mines, saving data on microfilm or (not joking) graved into copper plates).
tirsales is offline   Reply With Quote