So I'm imagining all the complaints (basically this entire thread) about the lack of Goodreads' oversight (performed by volunteers) that results in unpublished books getting reviews and ratings?
And this exchange didn't happen?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem
Everybody wants to blame Goodreads for lack of oversight. But Goodreads doesn't have staff to do this. This is the domain of Goodreads Librarians (volunteers). This is where you can request changes and corrections to the catalog.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop
They are also owned by the richest man on the planet and are used for profit. Goodreads isn't integrated with Nook or Kobo, you know.
|
If that's not SOME ONE suggesting "
it's their fault that Amazon is owns Goodreads, profits from Goodreads, and could, if it chose to, enhance the Goodreads experience by fixing problems like this", then I don't know what is.