View Single Post
Old 08-06-2022, 05:35 PM   #30896
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,414
Karma: 235678911
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One, PW4, PW5
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRussel View Post
I just started reading The Right Sort of Man by Allison Montclair, the first of the Sparks and Bainbridge series. Not one I'd heard of, but a review from a favourite author, Dana Stabenow, on Goodreads made me think I might enjoy it. Turns out I very much do enjoy it! About 2/3rds of the way through, but I had to stop and put the next couple on hold at my library.

The premise is that two women start up a marriage bureau business right after the end of WWII in London. But murder happens, and they end up having to solve it to protect their own business.

The period details read accurate (from an outsider's view, obviously)and the writing is funny, witty and really quite good.
OK, I have to differ here. Strongly. I abandoned it after two chapters because there were so many errors. A Detective Superintendent interviewing witnesses during the preliminary investigation! Referring to blood types (American) rather than blood groups (British). Using the phrase “reached out to me” as in getting in touch. In 1946! And my absolute peeviest of pet peeves, the author gets the titles wrong. Seriously, it’s not hard to get them right - and it shows the abysmal quality of her what might laughably be called “research”. There were other idiocies. I thought this was terrible.

As for the audiobook, the narrator was adequate. The women’s voices were a little stagey but fine; the men’s voices were dire at times. I suspect the narration added to my unhappiness, but it also meant I probably didn’t pick up on as many errors as I would have if I’d read it.

Are we still friends?
issybird is online now   Reply With Quote