View Single Post
Old 07-20-2022, 12:32 PM   #213
bookman156
Addict
bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 368
Karma: 1000000
Join Date: Mar 2016
Device: none
Quote:
There is no way that a barrister in 1795 or 1805, etc. would use "begs the question" that way.
That one's often flagged up to use only in a legal context as some tend to misunderstand the meaning. But why wouldn't a barrister then use that phrase? It's from Latin after all. (Or, you mean they wouldn't get it wrong then. No, I guess not.)

My favourite pet hate is 'centres around'/'centers around'. You can't centre around, you can only centre on. BBC News gets this wrong all the time.

Last edited by bookman156; 07-20-2022 at 01:23 PM. Reason: afterthought
bookman156 is offline   Reply With Quote