View Single Post
Old 04-10-2009, 03:59 AM   #746
zerospinboson
"Assume a can opener..."
zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
zerospinboson's Avatar
 
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKFFW View Post
Hence why I said if the law states it is illegal then it is.

As for the rest, like with any law, there are loopholes, ways around it, dumb juries, dumber lawyers and even dumber judges(no offence to any of those here) that makes it a mine field. In some cases people get away with murder but I wouldn't exactly say it isn't illegal based on that fact.
Hm. I could be mistaken, but isn't it the job of the legislators to fix loopholes, rather than juries/judges etc.?
Because I can assure you that as soon as judges, juries, etc. start interpreting the law 'liberally', there will be people whining about "judicial activism", and how that is even worse than "dumbness"; never mind the fact that the case will be dismissed by a judge on appeal because of technical improprieties.

It's all well and good (and above all oh so very convenient) to rail against "dumb" <something>, but it really helps if you at least get the group you want to be railing against straight.
zerospinboson is offline   Reply With Quote