View Single Post
Old 07-13-2022, 09:04 PM   #47
phillipgessert
Addict
phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.phillipgessert ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
phillipgessert's Avatar
 
Posts: 318
Karma: 3200000
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Device: Kindle 5th Gen
Semantics has nothing to do with what is shown. It is strictly in the markup, where appropriate tags are selected to express the structure of the document. Selecting a semantic element for its appearance, rather than its actual meaning, is a detriment to accessibility, worse than nothing at all. Like saying the grass is blue instead of declining to describe the grass in the first place.

hr, I would consider sort of a relatively uninformative semantic element anyway. And if you’re happy with it, I wouldn’t sweat it too much. But it is generally used to divide sections, so if this was all meant to improve accessibility, I’d call it a lateral move at best. Of course, none of us have seen the content. If you say it works for it, I believe you.
phillipgessert is offline   Reply With Quote