Thread: Aborted articles still appear in book meta comments
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2022, 10:58 PM   #1
modified
Connoisseur
modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!modified is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!
 
Posts: 90
Karma: 50742
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: PW5
Aborted articles still appear in book meta comments
I've noticed that if an article is errored out from the recipe, the ebook generated still has the article title in the metadata comments when examined with `ebook-meta`. Is this intended behaviour?

If it is, I would like to request that aborted article to not be included in the book meta because it is doesn't accurately reflect the internal contents and can be confusing.
modified is offline   Reply With Quote