View Single Post
Old 07-07-2022, 05:10 PM   #113
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,902
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NullNix View Post
... or, well, they try to. Both Firefox and Chrome now blacklist almost all antivirus scanners from running in the (sandboxed, security-sensitive) contexts in which the actual content of the webpage is accessible, because they are generally written by absolute monkeys on the assumption that they are *not* sandboxed, and as a result have a distressing tendency to call out to things prohibited within the sandbox (a list which is always growing, for good reasons) and get killed. And when this happens it leads to *every single webpage* turning into a sad-face crash, often after a browser update improves the sandbox.

The difference between virus scanners and rootkits and malware is basically just intent, these days. Virus scanners use a very large proportion of the techniques used by rootkits, and unsurprisingly things that actually want to be secure tend to react to virus scanners as if they were malware.
That's interesting. Fortunately, using Linux, makes me pretty ignorant about the state virus scanners. So it looks like this might be going a better direction than I thought. That's good news.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote