Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I still say a more accurate/logical (and lets face it: honest) comparison for your "330 million individuals making this decision" argument would have been to compare my indifference to those who inefficiently toast bread by using appliances that make wires glow by inefficiently converting their resistance to electricity to heat. Or to those who don't unplug all appliances that have displays/lights that stay on when turned off. But I understand that the illicitness of littering and murder made for a much sexier rebuke of my indifference to the wastefulness of technologies like wireless charging. [...]
|
I don't know, I think it's telling that your objection to my examples is that they are illegal, not that there may be socially responsible reasons for choosing not to litter or murder. It suggests that the only way to get humans to choose to be socially responsible is via legislation. That may be true.