View Single Post
Old 06-22-2022, 12:00 AM   #35
hobnail
Running with scissors
hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,590
Karma: 14328510
Join Date: Nov 2019
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
How did Disney win their suits over people displaying their DVD movies at public events?
Back in the early days of mp3s and people ripping and sharing their mp3s they didn't realize that the copyright laws forbade that; they thought that when they bought a cd that they owned the music on it. Then the RIAA started suing people. While all that brouhaha was going on I heard a piece on the local public radio about how music couldn't be played in a public setting without paying the artist royalties. It sounded like the RIAA put itself between the people paying these royalties, i.e., they collected them, and the musicians, who they gave a percentage to. So when you listen to the radio, the radio station is paying royalties each time they play something. So in theory if a restaurant plays some cds for background music they should be paying the RIAA.

So you can probably see how that extends to videos.

Last edited by hobnail; 06-22-2022 at 12:02 AM.
hobnail is offline   Reply With Quote