View Single Post
Old 04-09-2009, 10:48 AM   #24
LazyScot
DSil
LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.LazyScot ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
LazyScot's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,201
Karma: 6895096
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Device: Kindle, Cybook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
But when the UK government uses 'anti-terrorist' legislation against Icelandic banks - doesn't that undermine their credibility?
Yes.

That's why I said intention.

It's the old "when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" situation. Essential when a problem arises, the powers look in their legal toolbox and pull out whatever is to hand, without thinking about if it is appropriate. Hence, the problem is with the oversight of the powers to make sure they are used correctly. I personally have a lot of problems with the terrorism laws and they ways they are used, not least the extended detention before charge clauses. And that applies even when they are used on terrorists (I prefer the word "coward" here, but for clarity I'll stick with terrorist).
LazyScot is offline   Reply With Quote