Quote:
Originally Posted by whitearrow
The AG's statement, of course, assumes without discussion that TTS implicates "audio rights" in the first place, which is what they want everyone to simply accept. I would argue that there's a very good case to be made that TTS does implicate audio rights at all.
|
It doesn't have anything to do with copyright either (another claim they're trying to make).
As we discussed when this originally happened, this whole thing comes down to contract negotiations between authors/publishers/distributers. The rest of it is just posturing by one side or the other to try and get better contract terms.