View Single Post
Old 04-09-2009, 02:39 AM   #50
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by wodin View Post
More toxic than plutonium-242? Or Cesium-137? Or cobalt-60? Or Strontium-90?

I think not!
The typical nuclear power station has a generating capacity of perhaps 2GW, and produces a few cubic metres of high-level waste a year. I think you'll find, that if you compare that to the environmental impact of producing 2GW of generating capacity of solar panels, the nuclear solution comes out quite comfortably ahead in terms of "greenness".
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote