View Single Post
Old 04-09-2009, 12:22 AM   #1
Donnageddon
Now you lishen here...
Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Donnageddon's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,494
Karma: 479498
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle-ish
Device: Sony PRS-650. Kobo Touch, Kindle Fire
PRS 700 review from a K1 and PRS 505 user

I hemmed and hawed, but finally I succumbed. I bought a PRS 700.

My reasons for doing so really came down to its promised unification of what I love about my PRS 505 with the light wedge. Since I bought the light wedge for the 500 I found I wasn't using my Kindle 1 much at all. I prefer to read in subdued lighting (and total darkness... one of the features of the eb1150 that I really loved). The light wedge with the PRS 505 was a good solution, but it had its drawbacks. Its weight was not extreme, but lighter would be better. And the wedge had a habit of flying away from the screen when lying prone in bed.

The PRS 700 sounded like a good solution to these problems, while keeping the crisp eink lettering of the PRD 505 and Kindle 1.

There have been many reviews of the 700 already, and if you haven't I highly recommend Mos's video review of the 700 found here. She has done a fantastic job of highlighting the 700 and it's functionality. But I also know that some people have had negative reactions to the 700 aws their second eink reader purchase. It seemed to not be as readable as the non-touch screen eink readers. I want to give my honest perspective on my transition to the 700.

So, after that long preamble, I will touch on the major issues (pro and con) that others have mentioned.

1. Glare - I honestly have not found this to be an issue. That again may be because I prefer to read in subdued lighting, but I have used it in several situations with bright lighting. While it has more glare than the 505 of K1, it just does not seem difficult at all to find a comfortable angle to diminish the occasional glare. Usually a subtle shift will bring reduce the glare to a minimal amount.

2. Contrast - the contrast is lower in the 700 compared to the 505/K1, It is best described as grey background against dark grey lettering. Much of a persons reaction to that may have to do with personal eye comfort and preference, but I have found that it is actually still easy crisp reading. I don't see the "fuzziness" or cloudiness that others have remarked upon. I haven;t tried to capture this on camera, and I am convinced the 700 does not respond well to still pictures (perhaps it is superstitious about losing its soul to the camera) but Mos's video I think gives a fair representation of both the glare and contrast issue. as always YMMV.

3. Speed of page turn refresh - I honestly had no issue with the refresh rate of either the 505 or the K1. both seemed zippy enough for me. The 700 is faster, but not a factor for me. But the "rapid page skip" documented in Mos's video is an amazing thing to behold. There is virtually no "refresh flash" at all when fast forwarding or reversing. I think this may be to it not doing a complete reset when this function is used, but it does zip right along! I like this feature A LOT! *

4. Interface - the interface with the 700 is very intuitive, and a marked improvement from the 505/K1. The touch interface works smoothly and easily. Page turns require just a thumb swipe, and going from book to book tkaes a minimum of steps. Same with bookmarking, and resizing the font. I had not anticipated how much I would like the "cover view" of the 700. being able to view the covers of the books you have on the reader is just more pleasant than just reading a list of titles.

5. Side Lighting - I was at first wary of this feature (even though it was the major reason I bought the 700). the pictures I had seen looked like only the margins get much lighting. And at first, that seems very true. But I am amazed at how after a few moments the lighting just spreads across the whole page even in total darkness. It is not perfect, and not like back lighting, but the slight defects of side lighting just disappear after you get absorbed in the reading. I really don't even notice it after the first few moments.

6 Size and weight - even though the 700 is the same basic dimensions of the 505 and ever so slightly heavier than the 505 (sans light wedge) the 700 just seems smaller than the 505 (and tiny compared to either the K1 or K2) Very compact design and the bezels are not intrusive and uniform around the screen.

All in all, I am very happy with my new acquisition! No regrets at all. It makes for an excellent reader for my particular reading habits. I am still keeping the 505 for backup, and the K1 for those times when I want to use the whispernet for basic web browsing, but the 700 is going to be my main reader for the foreseeable future.**

Donn

* I can imagine someone with enough patience creating a "flip book" with a cartoon character jumping a fence that would look like basic animation with the "fast forward" feature of the 700.

** Until they get a flexible color reader with a screen that can accommodate graphic novels and manga.

Thanks for reading, and sorry for the length, I had no idea I had so much to say
Donnageddon is offline   Reply With Quote