Quote:
Originally Posted by RickyMaveety
And, what about that mother who popped out several children just to turn around and murder them and bury them in the yard .... is she just supposed to keep getting pregnant and offing them?? Do I think she should have been sterilized? Yes, I do. I can not imagine that she still has a "right" to breed.
|
WTF is this fascination with sterilizing an 8-fold murderer (if indeed she did exist)?
How the hell would she still be free after the first one or two if it indeed was known that she killed them?
It's entirely beyond believable to assume that she would still be free to go wherever she wants, if indeed she had already been caught and convicted for killing one (or more) of her children. And if she hadn't, how would you have known to sterilize her if you couldn't even catch her to convict her for infanticide?
This example is utterly implausible, and useless as a test case;
existing laws are more than capable of dealing with her crimes. There is no need for a "eugenics law".
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickyMaveety
You are kidding ... you have to be kidding. We're talking about people who have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they should not be allowed to produce children, because they are already addicted, or because they murder every child they produce [See above], or they cannot even take care of themselves .... and you are trying to turn that into forced sterilization of everyone who is from a certain ethnic group or has a particular IQ??
By that logic, you can''t put a man into prison because he killed another person because (gasp) even though he did it .... you'd have to imprison everyone from his ethnic group if you imprisoned him.
You just can't make that connection. Although, kudos for trying.
|
I can. Been there, done that,
Suggest you take your own advice earlier offered to Harry and read up. Unless you
really believe that
you'll do better this time around.