Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea
Adding a lot of nonsense characters to LGBT+ seems awfully like mocking to me. If I'm wrong, and that's a real acronym, I'd appreciate a link to help me learn better.
|
You are getting closer to understanding my point, but you're not quite there yet. I will try to restate it slightly differently: There are so many different genres of books, and letters in the gender/sex alphabet that I was using as a comparison, that even someone claiming to be part of the group they represent doesn't know if what I typed is real or not (e.g., your admission of "If I'm wrong...") This is a fine example to illustrate my point that there are too many subclassifications to be useful to the general public. Many people not personally invested in one of these book genres, or gender/sex alphabet letters as a comparison, don't know what it's supposed to mean. Too many subclassifications to remember, thus not very useful. Which was the point.