Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
What is wrong with that reasoning? That there is a reason does not mean that it is OK.
|
Sorry, I was short handing my response because work keeps intruding on my real life. The news heads are starting to "explain" the behavior of the shooter by saying that he was "disturbed" and that he felt upset because people were making fun of him and that he was an immigrant who was out of work because of the economy, etc. They don't come right out and say it, but there is an undercurrent of "this is what happens when..." that would lead one to believe that it was the victims' fault that the shooter was upset to begin with.
Basically, it was a guy with paranoid tendncies who was signalling that he was disturbed and then picked up his gun and started killing people. There is no need to give sensitivity training to the Greater New York Area to prevent this from happening again.