Thread: Fonts
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2022, 09:06 AM   #5
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
I have little doubt that what a person has grown up with has a strong influence on what they find easiest to read. Do I like serif fonts on my ereader simply because I grew up reading serif fonts in books, or is there a genuine difference? Did past studies effectively control for that historical use aspect?

And screen quality (not just PPI, but contrast and all the rest of it) has made a big difference. The subtleties between different serif typefaces, or between different sans-serif typefaces, was often lost on older screens. Now you really can tell the difference between a period and a fly-spec ... well, most of the time.

There are still enough lower resolution displays that sans-serif is sometimes a better choice, especially if you like small text, but it's getting less common as a real requirement. However that doesn't change what people have grown accustomed to seeing on screens, so I think sans-serif is often chosen now as a matter of convention or habit rather than genuine need - particularly when you look at the font sizes used on many sites.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote