Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
No. I was not incorrect. Regardless of what you or I believe should be deemed "reading", your argument IS actually a) old; and b) the portion of your post I quoted is, in fact, a classic example of a non-sequitur.
|
Ok, it's old. I guess that shows people have known for some time that reading is visual not aural and no reading is done with the ears. Listening, and tangentially, consuming books by listening, is done aurally but that isn't reading. It is consuming. And I confirmed this with she who knows all. Literally.
And it's an interesting and very enjoyable discussion.