Quote:
Originally Posted by LDB
A conclusion you are welcome to, incorrect though it is. Reading is a visual activity, not an aural activity. One reads with eyes and listens with ears, and not vice-versa. Reading has been adapted to the sightless through their sense of touch. Nothing aural is reading.
|
No. I was not incorrect. Regardless of what you or I believe should be deemed "reading", your argument IS actually a) old; and b) the portion of your post I quoted is, in fact, a classic example of a non-sequitur.