View Single Post
Old 04-04-2009, 09:50 PM   #33
Wetdogeared
Storm Surge'n
Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wetdogeared ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Wetdogeared's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,781
Karma: 8213195
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Polar Vortex
Device: S0ny PRS-300/350/505/700/T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
Well, best sellers cost less, because they are best sellers. They sell more. Of course, if the loose money on each best seller, they make it up in volume...

BOb
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmwilson View Post
Something to keep in mind is that Amazon takes 65% of the retail price of each Kindle book. If a book is $9.99, Amazon gets $6.50 (less any discount they offer) and the publisher gets $3.50...
If cmwilson is correct BOb, then Amazon doesn't really lose money on each sale of a best seller, they just don't make as much money per sale. I'm assuming by what you state is that the profit margin evens out in the end, after the volume of ebooks sold is taken into account.

From cmwilson's statement, it sounds as if Amazon *is* squeezing the publishers for lower prices, they get their 65% whatever the price is.

cmsilson did not disclose what amount/percent the authors royalties were who are not author/publishers like herself.

WDE.
Wetdogeared is offline   Reply With Quote