Very well. Perhaps a seeming reaction of frustration in such need to explain is from some misunderstanding of one of us. It is not that I am asking Sigil to change. It’s that to me, modifier keys are referred to by some class or enum identifier, and that is distinct from how it displayed to the user. It’s that I think Qt itself should natively provide such. But maybe I am missing something. Yet to me it’s clear that’s how it should be. Devs understand how to refer to such, it is encapsulated or abstracted; users may not. E.g., if some new platform someday appears and uses not even the names Ctrl meta alt? Or other?
Started out as a curiously from unfamiliarly with Qt and never really having looked at custom shortcuts. Maybe it is that Qt apps like apps in general not all provide custom shortcuts sp have no need to display the string to the user. So less may have noticed. Yes or no, someday I think someone will file such a bug and eventually that’s how Qt will behave.
