View Single Post
Old 04-04-2009, 03:30 PM   #78
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickyMaveety View Post
And where exactly are you getting this information?? I ask because nowhere, in any thing I have read about this law, do they state that evidence against someone will go before a court BEFORE they terminate access.

What I have read is that, if your ISP "suspects" that you are in violation they will send you and email, and then a letter, and then terminate access. Where are you getting all this evidence before a court information?? I'd really love to read it.

And, please, don't just tell me that you saw it somewhere. I'd prefer a link as the proof of what you are saying about this new law. Not just your usual "I was under the impression that ......"
I've already posted the link where I got my information, Ricky, but here it is again:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04...three_strikes/

This states that there will be no "automatic termination"; the matter will go to a body that's being set up with judicial powers, called the "Haute Autorité", which will have the power to impose fines, injunctions, or temporary suspension of Internet access. May I ask where you got your information that there will be some sort of "automatic" termination of access, because that's not at all in accordance with what I've read.

Happy reading!
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote