View Single Post
Old 04-04-2009, 03:27 PM   #77
RickyMaveety
Holy S**T!!!
RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.
 
RickyMaveety's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,213
Karma: 108401
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, California!!
Device: Kindle and iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Every law is subject to false accusions; that's why we have courts, to determine whether the accusation that has been made against someone is true or false. With this law that has been set up in France, the evidence against someone will be presented to a body that's been set up called the "Haute Autorité", which will determine what, if any, punishment is appropriate - temporary suspension of internet access, a fine, or an injunction banning them from certain activities. There is not, as has been incorrectly suggested by some on this thread, an automatic assumption of guilt and termination of internet access without "due process".
And where exactly are you getting this information?? I ask because nowhere, in any thing I have read about this law, do they state that evidence against someone will go before a court BEFORE they terminate access.

What I have read is that, if your ISP "suspects" that you are in violation they will send you and email, and then a letter, and then terminate access. Where are you getting all this evidence before a court information?? I'd really love to read it.

And, please, don't just tell me that you saw it somewhere. I'd prefer a link as the proof of what you are saying about this new law. Not just your usual "I was under the impression that ......"
RickyMaveety is offline   Reply With Quote