Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirtel
So your opinion is that we all see nonexistent differences? Sorry, but that's not something I can believe. I know what my eyes see and that's what matters to me. As I've said before, real life experience is vastly more important to most people than the specs on paper. You seem to think that if something is written in the specs, then that is the absolute and highest truth and everything else is an illusion. A very weird belief IMO.
As to the word "sharp", I mean exactly that. I see the text on the Sage is sharper and on the Oasis fuzzier. That's not the same as the contrast. Contrast is different when the text on one is darker than on the other.
|
I don't deny there are real differences between ereader screens. The problem is when there's contradictory information based on anecdotal perceptions of different users.
The example I used was the PW5 and the Oasis 3. You have one poster in this thread claiming there's a major difference between the two screens with the PW5 being inferior. Meanwhile, the general consensus among reviewers who have directly compared them head-to-head have concluded they're virtually indistinguishable.
Being skeptical when someone claims one Carta 1200 screen is clearly superior to another Carta 1200 screen seems reasonable.