View Single Post
Old 04-04-2009, 10:48 AM   #16
jj2me
Guru
jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jj2me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 820
Karma: 8820388
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: Sony PRS-505, -350; Kindle 3 3G, DX, PW 2; various tablets
Quote:
No. Not really. When displaying a PDF document (the amount of content on one page is fixed) it gives you larger text and graphics that are even more finegrained.

Make a simple test: display a page in word/pdf/whatever at a screen resolution of 800x600 on a 17" or 1920x1200 on a 24" monitor. Which one will look better and be better readable?

That's what I'm (we?) are asking for!
Ah, yes, you're right. Different from a PC desktop, which gives more screen real estate with smaller fonts, on the Reader there is always a rendering app that fills to screen.

Last edited by jj2me; 04-04-2009 at 02:56 PM.
jj2me is offline   Reply With Quote