View Single Post
Old 12-09-2021, 08:06 AM   #81
Leseratte_10
Groupie
Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Leseratte_10 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 183
Karma: 3587000
Join Date: Sep 2021
Device: PB Era, PB InkPad 3 Pro
I'm sure this would be interesting, but I don't think it's a good idea for me to take a look at this. A full copy of the RMSDK source on some random webserver doesn't look like it's deliberately been published by Adobe, and I'm definitely not interested in a lawsuit against Adobe if they start claiming my plugin would be based on confidential RMSDK code.

The best way to prevent that is to not even take a look at leaks like these. Looking at original source code while reverse-engineering something is usually a bad idea. Just like WINE devs are forbidden from looking at Windows source code. Also, given how well this plugin is already working, I don't think there would even be lots of useful information in that SDK anyways.
Leseratte_10 is offline   Reply With Quote