View Single Post
Old 04-03-2009, 12:54 PM   #4
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
"Real" proofreading is hugely labour intensive. It takes me 100-200h of work to properly proof-read one of the Dickens novels that I create, for example. By "real" proof-reading I mean comparing it line by line with the manuscript, and making sure that every punctuation mark is correct. If you simply read the OCR page and fix things that "look wrong", it's much quicker, but also much less accurate, of course, in that you've often no way to know when the OCR has used the wrong word if that word still "fits" in the context of the sentence.

One can certainly understand why publishers are reluctant to spend the money to properly proof OCR's "back-catalog" stuff that they convert to eBooks. Obviously a professional proof-reader can do the job a lot faster than I can, but the fact remains that it's still a labour-intensive, manual, process that costs money.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote