Thread: Sage Kobo Sage opinions
View Single Post
Old 11-06-2021, 11:02 AM   #413
guti
Member
guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.guti read the news today, oh boy.
 
guti's Avatar
 
Posts: 11
Karma: 96516
Join Date: May 2014
Device: Sony Reader PRS-T2, Kobo Aura HD, Tolino Vision 4, Kobo Forma
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGlitch View Post
Replying here as well just to keep things clean. I’d be very surprised if it was actually 320MB of RAM as that’s not a typical amount, they’d need to have installed some rather small increment RAM chips to hit it. At a guess I’d say whatever you did ended up looking at what was being used currently not the sum total, which has been reported elsewhere on the forums as 512.

512 is also not a step back as the Sage isn’t meant to be a replacement for the Elipsa, it’s replacing the Forma which also ran with 512MB.
My bad for having posted initially on the wrong thread .

The memory amount is the one reported by the OS on /proc/meminfo as MemTotal: the same value is 496MB on Forma and 320MB on Sage. It should represent the physical ram minus a part reserved for kernel and other things.
Your guess is also mine, which is why I would be happy if someone would point out to me that I am wrong.

Note that my reference to Elipsa was due to the fact that I believed Elipsa and Sage had the same SoC and memory.
On my post I was actually comparing my Forma with the Sage.
guti is offline   Reply With Quote