View Single Post
Old 04-02-2009, 09:53 PM   #3946
RickyMaveety
Holy S**T!!!
RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.RickyMaveety lived happily ever after.
 
RickyMaveety's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,213
Karma: 108401
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, California!!
Device: Kindle and iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
Excellent.

Normally I don't wish unhappiness upon others, but these guys have it coming.

Out of curiosity, how do you validate that emails are authentic for court? Or do you only have to do that if someone challenges their veracity? I'm just thinking that it's long past the point when your email service provider will want to admit that THEY have any copies.
No. These emails came off of the servers a long damn time ago. However, they are consistent with what I've been saying to everybody on the planet for the past several years. Their testimony has been "I do not recall", "I do not remember", "I have no recollection." I remembered the damn conversations, quite well as it turns out.

I'm sure they won't be very happy that I kept this correspondence. But, that's tough luck. In depo, they have been very careful about not directly stating anything that could be proved to be a lie. Saying you "don't remember" ... well, that's a safe bet ... even if someone later proves you said the thing you "don't remember" saying.

They told me so many damn lies .... about the amount of land, about the cats, about maintenance. Some of them are backed up by documents of record as well as in my emails. So, honestly, I don't see a problem in proving the truth of the emails.

Last edited by RickyMaveety; 04-02-2009 at 10:03 PM.
RickyMaveety is offline   Reply With Quote