View Single Post
Old 10-28-2021, 12:28 PM   #4
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,625
Karma: 169712392
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhampny View Post
I have stopped reading on my Forma because of an issue I have with the Kobo English dictionary. Not their definitions but rather their pronunciations. For me, understanding the pronunciation of a word is almost as important as the definition of a word. When I began reading with the Forma and using their dictionary, I couldn’t understand how to use their pronunciations and, eventually, decided to contact Kobo support who told me that Kobo use the International Phonetic Association code in their pronunciation guide.
I checked out the collection of dictionaries at the local library plus a dozen or so online variants. Of the 27 I looked at, 7 did not use the IPA for pronunciation. Two of those were Chinese language dictionaries that used pinyin and one was an antique dictionary that pre-dated the common use of IPA. One advantage to the use of IPA is that it is consistent as in my sample, the 4 American English dictionaries used 3 different phonemic systems for pronunciation.

Please note that this is in Canada not the USA.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote