Quote:
Originally Posted by mezzanine
Denies the manufacturer's claim without evidence. Denies the value of the scientific method. Avoids responding to arguments with reason. Condescends with eye-roll.
You fit right in on social media!  |
Scientific methods and manufacturer's claims are fine, but in real-life use personal experience is what counts. If the numbers on a paper say that the new screen is 15% better than the old screen, but that's not what my eyes actually see, those numbers don't matter a whit to me.
The overwhelming majority of actual Voyage owners have said that they've never seen another screen with such sharpness and contrast. If you want to ignore this and rather believe those numbers on the paper, you're of course free to do so. But to say that the practically unanimous opinion of all the posters here who have used the device in real life is nothing more than "woo-woo" and a bias, is just arrogance.
The Voyage was not any kind of a "dream device" for me; but I cannot argue with what my eyes saw when I compared it to the other devices. Its screen was sharper and more contrasty. I wish the Oasis had as sharp a screen, as I far prefer it to the Voyage, but it just doesn't. If I had a bias, it would be for the Oasis, not the Voyage.