View Single Post
Old 04-02-2009, 12:34 PM   #513
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Format C: View Post
So, give some actual numbers!

A "fair amount" has got to be something between "not enough" and "too much".
So, in your opinion how much is, in pounds, a "fair amount" to be paid to Dan Brown for his work?

I don't know - I can't put a figure on it. I see no reason to "ban" authors from becoming millionaires if their work is commercially successful, any more than we'd ban someone from being a success in any other field. The discussion here is about how long someone should be "allowed" to profit from their work, not how much money they make from it. I definitely believe that someone should be able to retain the "rights" to their creation for their lifetime, and there's a good case to be made for a short extension of that to provide for dependents.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote