View Single Post
Old 04-02-2009, 11:17 AM   #466
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetpea View Post
Why would the the estate of a deceased writer profit from the work done by that writer? I can understand copyright continuing while the writer is alive. It is his pension, and it gives him time to write more books (as Zelda nicely worded). But, as soon as the writer dies, he can't write more books and doesn't need the money anymore.

I work. I pay for a pension for when I'm done working (in a multitude of years). That money is taking from my pay, which I get for working.

But, as soon as I die, that pension stops. Even though I might have children and a husband. Why would this be different from writers?
Really? In this country, the widow/widower carries on receiving the pension for their lifetime.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote