Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Old Neon
So how, exactly, does free file-sharing of their music benefit them exactly? It would appear to me as though your adding insult to injury, further depriving them of any profits they may recieve, however small.
|
Please have a look at that article first, as the questions that raises are far more interesting than the question about what other way there is or could be in order to reimburse them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Old Neon
No, that’s not what I’m saying. However, I wonder how you would respond if, upon becoming famous, a self-painted self-portrait of yourself were used in a campaign to spread the idea that all races are not created equally, and that you, Mr. Famous so an so advocated extermination of all non-whites? Would you seek legal recourse to protect your image? Or would you consider it this racist group’s right to use you to spread their message?
As we’re discussing copyrighted works and images, I feel as though it is pertinent.
|
Actually, this is not pertinent, as it falls under (existing) legislation concerned with defamation/slander. Mickey Mouse never existed, while I do.