Quote:
Originally Posted by kyôdai
It becomes evident, that you don't know what a fact or an opinion is.
Or rather that you try to downplay facts as opinion, when you don't like them.
I will add this to the list of counter-arguments:
- But I like it!!!
- Page-turn buttons!!!
- The Oasis mated with another Oasis and magically evolved on its own!!!
- Every fact, that I don't like, is just an opinion!!!
It is not an opinion, it is a fact, that I have proven in previous posts.
But that is the beauty of facts. You can prove them.
You are saying that the Oasis is particulary lightweight and ergonomic, then please, show that to us.
Again, you don't know what an opinion or a fact is.
It is a fact, that the Oasis 2 was supposed to have a detachable cover.
It is a fact, that it does not have one (anymore) because of a design flaw. (Magnets, that were too weak to hold the detachable cover securely.)
It is your opinion, that you don't care about this.
This argument is on the list already.
It is the first one "But I like it!!!".
It does not change the fact, that the Oasis 2/3 has a metal backside, that most people have described as a bit slippery. |
You are the one who doesn't seem to know what a fact is. A fact is something objective, not depending on a given viewpoint. The ergonomics of the Oasis are subjective. Some love it, some don't and both viewpoints are equally valid. Ergo, they're opinions. The same goes for the metal back.
You can say a thousand times that the Oasis is not ergonomic. That doesn't make it so. You want to think it is so, be my guest. You have a right to your opinion.
And I haven't said that my opinion about the ergonomics of the Oasis is a fact. It's an opinion and as such, cannot be proven. Just like yours.