View Single Post
Old 09-15-2021, 01:50 PM   #78
Fiat_Lux
Addict
Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fiat_Lux ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Fiat_Lux's Avatar
 
Posts: 394
Karma: 6700000
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Gimel
Device: tablets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazrin View Post
Just curious if anyone is familiar with how these tests are done. Is the testing that Lexend describes reasonable and valid?
...
Anyway, looking for some insights on this type of study. Thank you!
Studies of this type are good for manufacturing headlines that make your font look good.

Change the following, and the resulting list of fonts and typefaces will change:
* Where the individual was born;
* What the first language that the individual learned to read;
* Size of the paper (A1 vs A4 vs A6);
* Type of publication (newspaper, magazine, brochure, book);
* Genre of material (academic report, mind-candy, literature, poetry);

* Language of material;
* Vocabulary used in the material;
* Syntax used in the material;

* Sequence of fonts and typefaces being read;
* Number of times the same font is repeated;
* Number of times the same typeface is repeated;
Fiat_Lux is offline   Reply With Quote