View Single Post
Old 07-04-2021, 11:27 PM   #54
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,718
Karma: 169712580
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
And for the record, my objections to @Odessa's comments are much more about the claim that the privacy statement is hidden and that it is "most non-private privacy statements I've come across" than anything else. And I seem to have forgotten to ask @Odessa for examples of what they consider to be better example.
It could be worse. One site I used to back in the early 2010's use had a statement in the TOS, that if any of the conditions of the TOS were violated, you were required to send your first born child to the operator of the web site. When I questioned this, I was told that in 3 years and hundreds of visitors, only 6 had read the EULA and questioned that section.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote