View Single Post
Old 07-02-2021, 12:03 PM   #225
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
If you look back over my earlier posts I am no supporter of the idea that there is any difference between reflected and direct photons. I was referring back to your earlier claim that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebase View Post
I think we've established "high contrast hurts your eyes".
The way in which "contrast" is usually used when discussing screen technology would make such a claim seem highly questionable. But now I'm wondering if it's just crossed wires.

The first pages of this thread were talking about screen brightness and whether people were smart enough to adjust it. I can't quite work out whether your use of "contrast" is actually just re-stating that earlier argument, talking about the difference (contrast) in brightness between the device and the environment. If so, it's very confusing because if you're hunting for screen adjustments the "contrast" control will give you something different to the "brightness" control, although the effects of the two are interrelated.

If, however, you really are talking about problems related to contrast-in-brightness between pixels of a display, then some credible evidence is needed rather than throw-away personal opinions.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote