View Single Post
Old 10-10-2006, 03:21 AM   #10
ath
Addict
ath doesn't litterath doesn't litter
 
Posts: 222
Karma: 110
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Malmo, Sweden
Device: iLiad, Sony PRS-505, Kindle Paperwhite & Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan
I've read a few books in the last few years that I honestly felt were padded with a lot of unneccessary character material that did not advance the story, nor make the characters or action more interesting or understandable.
I've noted the same thing ... First books on various computer topics began to reach 900-page levels without really having to, and then novels began to swell in the same manner. (Elizabeth George is rather too verbose for my taste, and Hamilton's 'Pandora's Star' I got kind of lost in somewhere in the middle and never cared to finish.) Elizabeth George knows how to write, though -- but some younger authors I suspect have not learnt the art of revising and cutting.

I've also put this down to publisher demand -- for some reason they find it simpler to sell voluminous books, and won't ask for literary liposuction. A bit like the insistence in Victorian times that all novels should come in three volumes -- or the libraries (or perhaps it was the customers) wouldn't even consider buying them. Looks like we're back at the 3-volume novel size, but all in one cover.
ath is offline   Reply With Quote