Quote:
Originally Posted by Ereadlog
Hey,
Comparing different channels I got impression that same ereaders seem to be more responsive on videos on Goodereader channel than when reviewed on other channels. So I thought maybe they just move hand in slow tempo, and then for the video they speed it up for example +3-10%. This way it would still look natural, but the device will appear faster than it really is. I saw similar comments about this on youtube. Obviously since they are a shop selling ereaders they have incentive to make their products seem the best possible.
|
I seriously doubt they use the same editing technique as The Chipmunks
Quote:
So did you notice similar things ?
Generally do you think their videos are objective ?
|
I don't think their videos are objective. All reviews are subjective.
I do think they spend too much time on things most people don't care about (the PDF experience). They have a habit of making the text so big (so as to look better on the camera) that it becomes useless in trying to get an idea of how the device actually looks. In general, I think they are poor reviewers.
But I do not think they use underhanded camera tricks for any reason.