View Single Post
Old 03-30-2009, 05:31 PM   #17
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
So really, if /anyone/ sends them a notice that they're hosting Harry Potter, they should take it down straight away.
Dear Moderators, pdurrant's post is an exact copy of a comment I read in a published book, and is an infringement of it's copyright. Please delete their comment from this thread.

OK, not really, but I think you can see how easily such a system would be abused. The only person who can issue a legally binding takedown notice is the copyright holder, specifically because they have to state "under penalty of perjury" that they are the copyright holder. Accepting notices from "anyone" would quickly escalate out of hand. You could start getting someone else's content removed just because you didn't like them, etc.

There's a reason that the DMCA requires it to come from the copyright holder, and even that is being abused.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote