View Single Post
Old 05-27-2021, 07:12 PM   #39
rkomar
Wizard
rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,058
Karma: 18821071
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury, ON, Canada
Device: PRS-505, PB 902, PRS-T1, PB 623, PB 840, PB 633
I expect that displays with a glass substrate have a higher production yield than those with plastic substrates. Perhaps the plastic substrates can warp during production, meaning that many have to be thrown away. That would make the ones with plastic substrates more expensive. I know that some complained about the Sony 13" displays being a bit lumpy, which you never see with glass substrate displays.
rkomar is offline   Reply With Quote