View Single Post
Old 05-27-2021, 11:41 AM   #23
ottischwenk
Wizard
ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottischwenk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ottischwenk's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,910
Karma: 3933245
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Salzburg AT
Device: Bigme 3/3, Boox 4/14, Like-/Meebook 2/8, Tolino 1/10, Ki/Ko 0/8
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkomar View Post
The substrate is _below_ the eink layer. It is not the surface that you touch on the outside of the device. The glass substrate is flat and rigid, but easily broken. The plastic substrate is not as flat and much less rigid, but more durable than glass. Since the plastic substrate can flex a little, you can make a case that is less rigid than for glass. That makes the device much lighter (thinner case, lighter display).
How often is this nonsense explained to me?

The module doesn't matter at all for the quality of the image - with an appropriate base, glass is also quite shatterproof; in terms of weight, there is hardly any difference.

The module needs a cover layer to the outside.

This can be made of plastic or glass - plastic is not as clear as glass - the image is worse; it can also be scratched much more easily.

The choice remains with 10.3: better image quality and slightly heavier vs. fairly shatterproof.
ottischwenk is online now   Reply With Quote