View Single Post
Old 05-18-2021, 06:44 PM   #9
Tex2002ans
Wizard
Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,306
Karma: 13057279
Join Date: Jul 2012
Device: Kobo Forma, Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
You also don't need <sup> for a footnote. You are best off with [##] (bolding it works well). You want the footnote to be large enough to be seen and pressed on.
roger64 never mentioned what he was using the <sup> for.

There are plenty of superscript things that aren't footnotes (chemical formulas, equations, etc.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
You don't need a line-height of 1. You can take that out. In fact, you can take out the entire class. You don't need it.
No. It completely depends on the actual book's code/context.

Quote:
Originally Posted by roger64 View Post
Once removed this line-height value, the sup tag display was again correct. If one does not want to suppress this 140% value of line-height for paragraph, the most logic solution is to add a different value of line-height to the sup tag (as Jellby advised).
Fantastic.

Jellby's solutions have always worked as long as I can remember.

Last edited by Tex2002ans; 05-18-2021 at 06:46 PM.
Tex2002ans is offline   Reply With Quote