Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
You really need to stop worrying about my motives for taking issue with some of your stated opinions. It also wouldn't hurt for you to get over your snark aversion. It's odd.
|
I love me some high-class snark. Count me in.
Quote:
|
What a lovely dissertation on "generic" as it applies to television content. The only problem I see that it doesn't even remotely address the falseness of your claim that people who prefer new and original (and don't rewatch show or movies) do so at the expense of quality. Not to mention the false equivalence you've made in suggesting that new and original equals "new generic" in the first place. Read your own words again and tell me how anyone couldn't have taken them any other way than I did.
|
I defy
anyone to tell me that if I choose to rewatch
The Wire, that I'm choosing generic s**t over quality. I could probably rewatch that show every second year and
still luxuriate in the sheer uniquity and quality of it. I still think it's the best thing over done on episodic TV.
Quote:
|
Still a terribly inaccurate statement. As if "quality" and "new and original" are somehow mutually exclusive. But whatever. You clearly can't look past a little snark to see the errors of your own words. So feel free to continue to be wrong. Someone has to be.
|
Oh, hell, I'm still recovering from the idea that Jon actually knows that
One Day At A Time was remade for NFLX, or that he knows that the remake is sh*te and the original wasn't. I may be traumatized all day by that.
Hitch