View Single Post
Old 03-13-2021, 05:18 PM   #223
MarjaE
Guru
MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MarjaE ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 939
Karma: 53902736
Join Date: Jun 2015
Device: multiple
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Since "current law" was mentioned, I was wondering if there was some sort of morality law.

I would think that if there was a contract, the publisher couldn't just stop publishing something if it broke the contract.

In this case, the Suess estate appears to be both the copyright holder and publisher, so they can pretty much do what they want?
I mean as opposed to shorter terms or mandatory licensing. Either of which would allow 3rd parties to publish. But in that case the original estate and/or publisher would still not be required to continue publishing the books in question, and could still curate a recommended list.
MarjaE is offline   Reply With Quote