View Single Post
Old 03-13-2021, 06:58 AM   #209
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,699
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
If you don't want to be painted as a pouty teenager, don't act like a 9th grade who is trying to be cool by snarking at people. Most of us outgrew that sort of behavior.
Again: I don't care what you think of me personally. But if it makes you feel better to type it--have at it.

As for the data: I can only assume you're being deliberately obtuse.

Me: the 6 books in question were poor sellers
You: Seuss a poor seller? You want to stick with that?
Me: yes the 6 books in question were poor sellers.
You: there's been a huge surge in Seuss sales after the kerfuffle. Do you still want to stick with your story?
Me: Yes. The 6 books in question were (and still are poor sellers).
You: Do you deny that this triggered a run on Seuss books?
Me:

I've never once denied that this tempest in a teapot caused Seuss sales to spike after the fact. But primarily because it wasn't relevant AT ALL to my point that the 6 books that the Seuss Foundation decided not to reprint were poor sellers.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote