View Single Post
Old 03-09-2021, 12:42 PM   #35
j.p.s
Grand Sorcerer
j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,795
Karma: 103362673
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottischwenk View Post
And again we speak of different things.
8 is completely irrelevant for the brightness and contrast of the display - but 1 and 2 are important and that is more transparent with a glass module (Note Air) than with a 10.3 inch Mobius - I said nothing else in article 16.And with Mobius (flexible) layers 1 and 2 cannot consist of glass.
The entire point of Mobius is that 8 is flexible because it it not glass. Mobius in practice might only have layers 1 and 2 that are optically inferior to whatever the optically best layers 1 and 2 on previous screens, but that is not inherent to whether or not 8 is flexible.

All prior screens had glass substrates no matter what the materials of the top layers and there have been a variety of top layer materials. If you have complaints about the top layers it only injects confusion to associate that with Mobius.

When you write Mobius in reference to e-ink displays, people that know anything will associate that with the flexible substrate (8). If your focus is on any other aspect, you need to be explicit and/or provide sufficient context.
j.p.s is offline   Reply With Quote